Asana vs Jira (2024): Which Instrument Ought to You Select? – Uplaza

Asana and Jira are two well-liked undertaking administration instruments that assist agile administration.

Though each instruments show to be fairly complete, Asana is a versatile and user-friendly instrument that appeals to a greater diversity of groups, from advertising and marketing to gross sales, design and extra. It gives a easy, visible approach to arrange work, with options like activity lists, kanban boards, calendars and extra.

Then again, Jira, developed by Atlassian, is a undertaking administration instrument designed particularly for software program improvement groups. It gives a sturdy characteristic set that helps agile methodologies, together with scrum and kanban boards, backlogs, dash planning instruments and extra.

Asana vs. Jira: Comparability desk

Options	Asana	Jira
Our score	4.6 out of 5	3.9 out of 5
Beginning value (billed month-to-month)	$13.49 per consumer per 30 days	$8.15 per consumer per 30 days
Ease of use	Simple	Extra complicated
Agile assist	Sure	Sure (extra strong)
Native time monitoring	Sure	Sure
Gantt charts	Sure	Sure

Asana vs. Jira: Pricing

Asana’s pricing construction is simple, with three tiers for people and companies, together with a free tier providing primary performance with assist for as much as 10 customers. However you’ll need to pay for options like Gantt and Timeline views. The remaining two tiers are reserved for enterprises for which you’ll obtain pricing upon request.

As for Jira, now we have 4 tiers, with a free tier that accommodates as much as 10 customers. The 2 premium tiers after the free tier price a lot lower than comparable tiers in Asana. Nevertheless, when Jira is billed yearly, it does away with per-user prices with tiers that accommodate greater than 200 customers. This gives the look that, whereas Jira is accessible to smaller groups, its pricing is way more appropriate for bigger and scaling groups.

Asana pricing

• Private: Free endlessly.
• Starter: $10.99 per consumer per 30 days, billed yearly, or $13.49 per consumer per 30 days, billed month-to-month.
• Superior: $24.99 per consumer per 30 days, billed yearly, or $30.49 per consumer per 30 days, billed month-to-month.
• Enterprise: Customized pricing.
• Enterprise+: Customized pricing.

For extra info on Asana, learn our full Asana assessment or take a look at our Asana alternate options.

Jira pricing

• Free: Obtainable for as much as 10 customers.
• Normal: $8.15 per consumer per 30 days.
• Premium: $16 per consumer per 30 days.
• Enterprise: Customized pricing, solely billed yearly.

For extra particulars, take a look at our full Jira Software program assessment, or for different concepts, assessment our Jira alternate options.

Asana vs. Jira: Function comparability

Agile assist

Winner: Jira

Asana helps agile undertaking administration with its kanban-style boards. They’re a visible approach to handle workflows, permitting groups to trace progress with ease and prioritize duties successfully. Despite the fact that Asana’s boards are user-friendly and versatile — coupled with capabilities like customized fields and activity dependencies, which can be utilized to create scrum-like workflows — it lacks among the superior options present in instruments particularly designed for agile improvement​ like Jira. Jira is a greater match for groups utilizing a extra versatile or hybrid method to agile.

Groups utilizing scrum or kanban methodologies will probably be proper at house with Jira’s agile boards. The boards are extremely customizable and built-in with different Jira options, equivalent to backlogs and dash planning instruments. Jira’s agile capabilities are extra superior than Asana’s, offering thorough performance to handle complicated initiatives and monitor progress precisely​.

Native time-tracking

Winner: Tie

Asana offers a local time-tracking characteristic for Superior, Enterprise and Enterprise+ clients, permitting customers to maintain monitor of time spent on duties immediately throughout the platform. Moreover, you’ll be able to combine it with a number of time-tracking instruments like Harvest, Everhour and Toggl to trace time spent on varied duties immediately inside Asana. These integrations turn out to be useful for groups that need time monitoring however aren’t subscribed to the superior pricing tiers in Asana. They will additionally turn out to be useful for customers who might discover extra performance in an integration in comparison with native time monitoring.

Jira additionally has a built-in time-tracking characteristic. Customers can log work on a problem and monitor time spent, remaining and authentic estimates. The platform offers quite a few configuration choices for time monitoring and reporting, making it really feel like you have got higher flexibility and oversight of your monitoring actions. Groups utilizing scrum or kanban methodologies will worth this, as monitoring time spent on duties helps with dash planning and managing work in progress.

Gantt charts

Winner: Asana

It may be argued that Asana’s Timeline view can supply Gantt capabilities to a sure diploma. Nevertheless, Asana does have Gantt performance unbiased of its Timeline view. I discovered mapping out undertaking plans visually and displaying activity dependencies and timelines to be simple in Asana. These charts are simple to make use of and combine seamlessly with different undertaking views, which makes it easy to modify between completely different views on a undertaking. Nevertheless, Asana’s Gantt characteristic isn’t out there for the Private plan, although the Timeline view is.

Speaking about timeline views, Jira’s Timeline view is one among its two native Gantt chart choices. With it you get the instruments and controls to trace complicated initiatives with a number of duties and big groups. Nevertheless, it’s greatest for team-level administration. The second providing is Plans, a complicated planning characteristic that visualizes work for a number of groups, initiatives and even organization-wide initiatives. It’s out there in Jira Premium.

Ease of use

Winner: Asana

Asana is thought for its intuitive, user-friendly interface. Its design focuses on simplicity, making it simple for brand spanking new customers to get began rapidly. In comparison with Jira, I discovered it to be simpler to select up and use. The visible structure, mixed with drag-and-drop performance, made managing duties and initiatives way more intuitive. For groups on the lookout for a low studying curve​, Asana is usually a nice match. Nevertheless, it’s value noting that it has superior options that will take a while to grasp.

Jira’s interface can really feel extra complicated because of its in depth characteristic set and customization choices.

Whereas Jira does an excellent job of onboarding new customers and making the platform really feel as easy to select up as attainable, Jira’s strong characteristic set and extremely technical nature work towards it because it nonetheless feels complicated, particularly to the non-technical consumer. Even so, whereas this complexity is usually a problem for brand spanking new customers, Jira offers complete tutorials and documentation to assist customers navigate its options, but it surely typically requires extra time to grasp in comparison with Asana​.

Buyer assist

Winner: Jira

Asana gives varied assist choices, relying on the pricing plan. The free plan contains entry to neighborhood assist and primary Asana assist. Paid plans present extra in depth assist, with 24/7 assist out there solely to enterprise customers. Asana additionally gives a variety of assets equivalent to tutorials, webinars and an in depth data base​ which can be found in most of its pricing tiers.

As for Jira, we’re taking a look at extra strong buyer assist throughout its pricing tiers. The free plan contains entry to the Atlassian neighborhood. The usual plan gives native enterprise hours assist, whereas the premium plan offers 24/7 assist for important points. Enterprise customers profit from 24/7 assist for all points and a better uptime SLA.

Safety

Winner: Tie

Asana prioritizes safety with options like knowledge encryption at relaxation and in transit and options like SAML, SIEM integration, DLP and superior admin controls out there in its enterprise plans. The platform complies with main trade requirements, equivalent to SOC 2 Kind II, that means that strong knowledge safety measures are always in place​.

Jira additionally has thorough safety features, significantly in its premium and enterprise plans. These embody superior admin controls, SAML SSO, SCIM for consumer provisioning and encryption. Jira’s enterprise plan additionally offers extra safety measures equivalent to audit logs, BYOK encryption and compliance with varied trade requirements, making it appropriate for organizations with stringent safety necessities​.

Asana execs and cons

Professionals of Asana

• Has a user-friendly interface and is extremely versatile.
• Visible method to undertaking administration that makes it simpler for groups to handle their work.
• Its versatility means it’s appropriate for a variety of industries and groups.
• Asana has a variety of integrations.

Cons of Asana

• Asana lacks among the extra superior options present in instruments like Jira.
• Its reporting options really feel restricted in comparison with Jira.
• No native time monitoring in decrease plans.
• Could have too many options for small groups to completely make the most of

Jira execs and cons

Professionals of Jira

• Concentrate on agile methodologies makes it a robust instrument for software program improvement groups.
• Has superior reporting and analytics capabilities.
• Pricing adjusts primarily based on the variety of customers, making it nice for scaling groups.
• Has in depth Gantt performance.

Cons of Jira

• Extremely technical nature is a barrier to entry for non-technical customers.
• May be overwhelming for first-time customers.
• Has a restricted collection of undertaking views.
• Collaboration instruments are restricted.

Ought to your group use Asana or Jira?

It comes right down to your wants and workflows. In case your workforce values a user-friendly interface with versatile activity administration, Asana is the higher selection. Then again, in case your workforce is closely invested in agile methodologies, significantly in a software program improvement context, Jira might present vital benefits.

Nevertheless, nothing beats first-hand expertise, and since Asana and Jira supply free plans, we encourage you to check out every instrument and see which one works greatest on your workforce.

Select Asana if . . .

• You want a user-friendly resolution with easy agile performance.
• You want primary to intermediate undertaking administration options.
• You want an answer that’s adaptable to a wide range of groups and industries.
• You worth collaboration and communication instruments.
• You don’t desire a steep studying curve in your undertaking administration instrument.

Select Jira if . . .

• You require superior undertaking monitoring alongside superior agile options.
• You want in depth customization and integration capabilities.
• You’re in a extremely technical area, particularly software program improvement.
• You already use different Atlassian instruments.
• You need to have superior reporting and analytics.

Evaluate methodology

For this head-to-head, the important thing criterion for comparability was how Asana and Jira method agile undertaking administration. We signed up for the free trials provided by each instruments for hands-on expertise with every to find out their ease of use, strengths and weaknesses. We then in contrast our findings with the platforms’ options and capabilities listed on their net pages.

Lastly, we checked our findings towards the suggestions of real-world customers to see whether or not we had comparable experiences. Under is a abstract of how they in contrast throughout standards past agile administration.

Standards	Asana	Jira
Options	4.9/5	5/5
Pricing	2/5	4.4/5
Ease of use	5/5	4/5
Service and assist	2.9/5	4.3/5